翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Fitri Department
・ Fitri Saari
・ Fitri Shazwan Raduwan
・ Fitriani
・ FITS
・ Fits
・ Fits (album)
・ FITS (board game)
・ Fits and Starts
・ FITS Liberator
・ Fits of Gloom
・ FitsAir
・ FitSM
・ Fitsum Zemichael
・ Fitch Lovell
Fitch notation
・ Fitch Park
・ Fitch Ratings
・ Fitch Robertson
・ Fitch Senior High School
・ Fitch Waterman Taylor
・ Fitch's General Store and House
・ Fitch's paradox of knowability
・ Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery
・ Fitch, North Carolina
・ Fitch-Hoose House
・ Fitchburg
・ Fitchburg (MBTA station)
・ Fitchburg and Worcester Railroad
・ Fitchburg Art Museum


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Fitch notation : ウィキペディア英語版
Fitch notation
Fitch notation, also known as Fitch diagrams (named after Frederic Fitch), is a notational system for constructing formal proofs used in sentential logics and predicate logics. Fitch-style proofs arrange the sequence of sentences which make up the proof into rows. A unique feature of Fitch notation is that the degree of indentation of each row conveys which assumptions are active for that step.
== Example ==

Each row in a Fitch-style proof is either:
* an assumption or subproof assumption.
* a sentence justified by the citation of (1) a rule of inference and (2) the prior line or lines of the proof which license that rule.
Introducing a new assumption increases the level of indentation, and begins a new vertical "scope" bar that continues to indent subsequent lines until the assumption is discharged. This mechanism immediately conveys which assumptions are active for any given line in the proof, without the assumptions needing to be rewriten on every line (as with sequent-style proofs).
The following example displays the main features of Fitch notation:

0 |__ (want P iff not not P )
1 | |__ P (want not not P )
2 | | |__ not P (for reductio )
3 | | | contradiction (introduction: 1, 2 )
4 | | not not P (introduction: 2 )
|
5 | |__ not not P (want P )
6 | | P (elimination: 5 )
|
7 | P iff not not P (introduction: 1 - 4, 5 - 6 )

0. The null assumption, ''i.e.'', we are proving a tautology

1. Our first subproof: we assume the l.h.s. to show the r.h.s. follows

2. A subsubproof: we are free to assume what we want. Here we aim for a reductio ad absurdum

3. We now have a contradiction

4. We are allowed to prefix the statement that "caused" the contradiction with a not

5. Our second subproof: we assume the r.h.s. to show the l.h.s. follows

6. We invoke the rule that allows us to remove an even number of nots from a statement prefix

7. From 1 to 4 we have shown if P then not not P, from 5 to 6 we have shown P if not not P; hence we are allowed to introduce the biconditional

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Fitch notation」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.